Journalists and academics bear the brunt of the massive crackdown on freedom of expression in Turkey. Scores of them are currently subject to criminal investigations or behind bars. This website is dedicated to tracking the legal process against them.


Fatma Sibel Gürcihan released pending trial; access to Alican Uldağ's X account blocked; investigation launched against Zilan Azad over Gülistan Doku interview
Access to Alican Uludağ’s X account blocked
Access to journalist Alican Uludağ’s X account has been blocked.
Uludağ announced the development on his social media account: “Personal announcement: As my X account has been blocked in Turkey, I will now be using this account @alicanuludag.”
Investigation launched against Zilan Azad over Gülistan Doku interview
An investigation has been launched against İlke TV reporter Zilan Azad over an interview titled “Whilst men in suits play their own game of chess, women are struggling to survive.”
In an interview with Selin Top, a member of the I Need Peace Women’s Initiative, she had discussed the investigation into the disappearance of Gülistan Doku, the accounts shared by women in Tunceli, and organized crime gangs. Cem Tekinoğlu, an adviser to YENİ Party MP Cemal Enginyurt, filed a criminal complaint against İlke TV reporter Zilan Azad and Selin Top, accusing them of “insult,” “defamation” and “violation of personal rights” over the allegations made against him.
Zilan Azad and Selin Top gave statements on 4 August as part of the investigation.
International travel ban imposed on Can Bursalı
Journalist Can Bursalı gave a statement at the prosecutor’s office on 4 August as part of an investigation launched by the Istanbul Chief Public Prosecutor’s Office on suspicion of “defamation,” “insult,” and “insulting the Turkish nation.”
Bursalı was questioned about the news reports and posts he had made via his X social media account. His reports and posts regarding the Istanbul Metropolitan Municipality (İBB) case and the Amasra mining disaster were also cited as grounds for the charges.
Bursalı stated that the posts and reports in question were part of his journalistic activities and denied the charges brought against him.
Following his statement to the prosecution, Bursalı was referred to the duty magistrate’s court with a request for judicial supervision. Bursalı was released on condition that he sign in at the police station three days a week and is barred from traveling abroad.
Furthermore, access to journalist Can Bursalı’s social media account has also been blocked. From the evening onwards, Bursalı’s X account was made invisible from within Turkey.
Fatma Sibel Gürcihan released pending trial
The first hearing in the trial of imprisoned journalist Fatma Sibel Gürcihan on charges of “publicly spreading false information” over a social media post concerning former Minister of Treasury and Finance Berat Albayrak, was held at the Anadolu 78th Criminal Court of First Instance on 4 August 2026.
Gürcihan, who was brought from the Marmara Women’s Closed Prison where she is being held, was present in the courtroom under the escort of the gendarmerie. Gürcihan’s family also attended the hearing, which was monitored by P24.
After her identity was verified, Gürcihan began her defense, stating the following: “I am a journalist who obtained my press card 26 years ago. I posted a tweet on 30 June; the content of this post is accurate. Berat Albayrak is a former minister who, after stepping down seven years ago, was not seen on the political scene again. Journalists also receive information from behind the scenes; like my fellow journalists, I had heard of Albayrak’s desire to return to politics. Around eight years ago, there were rumors of a family dispute and that Berat Albayrak had been assaulted, and reports were published on these matters. After hearing the news that he wished to return to politics, I recalled this information and shared what I remembered about the incident. The criteria for determining the accuracy of news in journalism differ from those in the legal system. When we obtain a piece of information, we first attempt to contact the parties involved in order to verify it. The behind-the-scenes information we obtain is alsosomething we assess to establish its accuracy. I shared what I did believing it to be true.”
Following Gürcihan, lawyer Çağrı Çetin stated that he would make a statement after the prosecutor had spoken.
The prosecutor requested that Gürcihan’s detention be continued.
Çetin, one of Gürcihan’s lawyers, said, “My client has a child. Taking into account the time spent in custody and the fact that the evidence has been gathered, we request that a decision be made to release my client.” Lawyer Gamze Nur Sancılı, who argued that the material and moral elements of the offense had not been established, alsorequested a decision to release her.
The court ordered Fatma Sibel Gürcihan’s release, subject to an international travel ban, and adjourned the case until 22 October 2026.
Click here to read the details of the article.
At least 19 journalists and media workers behind bars in Turkey
Following the release of Fatma Sibel Gürcihan, as of 7 August 2026, there are at least 19 journalists and media workers in prison in Turkey, either awaiting trial or serving finalized sentences.
The full list can be accessed here
